Bridging the Gap Between Law, Medicine, and the Jury: A Founder’s Perspective
In litigation—especially medical malpractice cases—the strongest evidence can fall short if the people deciding the outcome don’t fully understand it. Before founding IQorb, I worked at the intersection of two demanding fields: law and medicine. But the most significant challenge I observed wasn’t just the gap between those disciplines—it was the disconnect between the three groups who must collaborate for justice to be served: the attorney, the medical expert, and the jury.
Three Languages, One Verdict
Each group enters the courtroom with its own language:
Attorneys communicate in terms of causation, duty, breach, and damages.
Medical experts speak in the language of physiology, pathology, imaging, and complex data.
Jurors—the only group whose perspective ultimately determines the verdict—interpret information through the lens of everyday experience, common sense, and visual learning.
It’s no surprise that even well-prepared testimony can become overwhelming or confusing for jurors. When understanding breaks down, cases lose momentum—not because the evidence is weak, but because the explanation wasn’t accessible.
A Surprising Lesson From an Unexpected Source
The importance of bridging this communication gap became undeniable when I hired a new team member with no medical or legal background. As they reviewed case materials and early drafts of our animations, their questions revealed exactly where a typical juror might become lost. Their fresh perspective offered something invaluable: the layperson’s honest view of what is clear, what is confusing, and what needs to be visualized.
That experience reinforced a critical truth: accuracy means nothing if comprehension fails.
Medical experts and attorneys can provide perfect information—but unless jurors can interpret it, the truth gets buried.
Why IQorb Takes a Different Approach
This insight shaped the strategy behind IQorb’s demonstrative evidence services. Our goal isn’t merely to place medical drawings or labels on a screen. Instead, we’ve built a process that ensures clarity at every step.
We combine medical illustrators with non-medical, non-legal reviewers that think like jurors.
We extract precise medical and legal information from the experts on your case.
We translate that data into clear, scientifically accurate, and legally admissible 3D animations designed for maximum juror understanding.
Our mission is simple yet essential:
Make complex evidence undeniably clear to the people who hold the verdict.
Closing the Gap, Strengthening the Case
When attorneys, medical experts, and jurors finally “speak” a shared visual language, cases transform. Testimony becomes clearer. Arguments become more persuasive. Jurors understand not just what happened, but why it matters.
This is the power of visual communication—and it’s the foundation on which IQorb was built.